This just popped into the old inbox. Enjoy.
![]() |
H/T to JW |
Justification:
The
right or freedom of association implies the converse, disassociation, to also
be a right in a free society. The proposed amendment will guarantee that right
to both current members of this organization and to their posterity.
No club
or organization except the military can force someone to remain a
"member" for any period of time once the member no longer feels the
club or organization is, or has become something other than, what they thought
when they voluntarily joined.
This
proposed amendment simply codifies that right.
I
hope that each of you reads the entire amendment AND discusses it with your
clubs before forming an opinion.
Freedom
of association is the right to join or leave groups of
a person's own choosing, and for the group to take collective action to
pursue the interests of members. It is both an individual right and
a collective right, guaranteed by all modern and democratic legal systems,
including the United States Bill of Rights, article 11 of
the European Convention on Human Rights and the Canadian Charter of
Rights and Freedoms, and international law, including articles 20 and 23
of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and Conventions 87 and 98 of
the International Labour Organization.
Background:
Before we begin to debate the
merits of my proposed amendment I wanted to take this opportunity to speak
directly to the members of the various county chapters that comprise the
NYSYRs.
You may have already heard
rumors about what this amendment is all about and may have even been instructed
as to how you should vote when it comes before you for your consideration
today.
Excerpts from: History of Our Organization (NYSYR.US):
The Association of New York State Young Republican
Clubs, Inc can best be defined in it’s past, present, and future by a statement
found in the 1939 Convention Journal.
“Yet organization work does not aim
merely at the formation of clubs in every one of the counties, nor will it be
sufficient when every city and village in the state contains an active Young
Republican Club. For every year more young men and women reach voting age for
the first time, every one a citizen who needs political education, everyone
potentially an individual who can render valuable political service to his community,
his state, his nation. Everyone an immediate problem for and a future asset to
the Young Republican Clubs”
Today, we may not be the association of yesteryear.
But through hard work and unity we can achieve whatever goals we set for
ourselves. We as Young Republicans are charged with the responsibility of
educating the youth of this state with the right message. We must work to
assure that our generation does not fall victim to complacency, and laziness.
The “older” people in our lives will never pay attention to us if we don’t
speak loud enough. Speaking loud enough does not necessarily mean shouting out
anything to hear ourselves talk. It does mean however, setting a platform for
ourselves and pushing our social agenda in the same way that every other group
in society does. We once did that….and because of it, when Young Republicans
spoke people listened. We must achieve that way of thinking again…if not for
ourselves,…if not in the name of Young Republicans past,… but for the sake of
the future of our Empire State.
Excerpt from the NYSYR Incorporation Document (1934*):
(Emphasis added)
The purpose for which it
[NYSYR] is to be formed are:- To promote and maintain the principles of the
Republican Party; to foster within the Republican party and make practical in
service of the municipality, state, and nation, the idealism characteristic of
youth; to correct in our own party that tendency of all parties to make
organization an end rather than a means; to develop sound principle and
public spirit in party politics; to promote honest and fair electoral
methods, to the end that the expression of the popular will be whatever party
or body, shall be as free, untrammeled and equal as possible; to resist
and expose political corruption; to advocate merit rather than partisan service
as entitling to public office; to watch legislation; to encourage public
attention to and efficiently criticize the conduct of government, to
encourage constantly the participation in party politics of young men and women
of high character, intelligence and ability.
*This was signed by the first 6 directors which included
George H. Sibley who was the NYSYR Chairman at the time.
Executive Summary:
If this amendment is passed
today nothing in this organization will be changed. No clubs are
de-credentialed as a result and no affirmative action need be taken by anyone.
This is simply a “check” on the power of the Governing Board of the NYSYR by
the members since their voices are rarely if ever heard on any matters of
substance.
Secretary of Defense Donald
Rumsfeld once brilliantly said “The message is that there are no
"knowns." There are things we know that we know. There are known
unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But
there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we do not know we don't know. So
when we do the best we can and we pull all this information together, and we
then say well that's basically what we see as the situation, that is really
only the known knowns and the known unknowns. And each year, we discover a few
more of those unknown unknowns.”
The true strength of any
organization is to anticipate and prepare for the unthinkable. The Founding
Fathers knew this all too well when they drafted the Bill of Rights. They
placed limits on their own power (and subsequent administrations) because they
knew then that there were numerous unknown, unknowns.
I pose the following questions to you:
What should YR organizations
be? Are we that?
What exactly do the opponents
of this amendment oppose?
Do they oppose the amendment
or the proponent of the amendment?
Questions I have received over the past 21 days:
Wouldn't this destroy the
NYSYR if clubs started de-credentialing?
The thresholds needed to
de-credential are high. No club (not even my home club) would take such a vote
lightly. There would have to be overwhelming support to achieve a
de-credentialed status. I call your attention to what was written above in our
Incorporation Document: “to correct in our own party that tendency of
all parties to make organization an end rather than a means”
Why couldn't a club just not
credential in the first place?
They could choose not to
credential. But what if you signed up to join a republican club and they
started endorsing democrats. This sounds crazy but if you read our rules there
is nothing that could stop our Governing Board from making any endorsement for
any candidate for any office! This is both a known-unknown as well as an
unknown-unknown.
If that were to happen, shouldn't there be a mechanism in place to allow for a county chapter to
disassociate itself from the state organization?
Amendment Text:
Addition to Article I
G Any Member can
voluntarily relinquish its “credentialed status” (de-credential) by submitting
written notification to the Corresponding Secretary who will forward the same
to the Governing Board within seven days of receiving such notification. A
request to de-credential shall not preclude any Club from requesting
credentialing at a later date.
1
The notification must include the following
information.
a)
De-credentialing Club’s Meeting Minutes showing
that a vote was taken to de-credential with the New York State Young
Republicans and passed by two-thirds of the Club’s Members present.
b)
A list of Members present and written
confirmation from the President/Chairman of that club stating that there was a quorum.
2
The Governing Board shall grant the Member
Club’s request to de-credential within seven days of receiving the request from
the Corresponding Secretary if all required information is submitted.
3
There will be no vote by the Governing Board
except as to whether or not all of the required information was submitted by
the Member Club.
4
If the Governing Board determines that there is
required information missing, the Corresponding Secretary shall notify the
Member Club within three days of such determination to submit any missing
information.
5
The Member Club can submit to the Corresponding
Secretary the identified missing information or can withdraw its request to
de-credential within 90 days. After 90 days the Member Club seeking to
de-credential must submit a new request with the information required in
Section 1, a and b.
6
Upon receipt of any missing information the
Corresponding Secretary shall forward the same to the Governing Board within
three days and the Governing Board shall have three additional days to request
any further information required in Section 1, a and b.
7
If any of the above time deadlines are missed by
the Corresponding Secretary and/or Governing Board or the de-credentialing
packet is deemed to be complete, the Member Club shall be considered
de-credentialed immediately and all reference to said club shall be removed
immediately from all media and correspondence generated or controlled by the
NYSYRs with the exception that an email shall be sent to all other Member Clubs
identifying the de-credentialed club by name and stating that said club
voluntarily relinquished its credentialed status.
8
De-credentialing Clubs shall forfeit their
credentialing fee and must submit a new credentialing fee in full if the Member
Club seeks to credential at a later date.
This proposed amendment was submitted by Russell Gallo (Brooklyn) and was overwhelmingly defeated at the meeting in Orange County on October 5th, 2013.
"Our Lives, Our Fortunes, Our Sacred Honor"
ReplyDelete“The probability that we may fail in the struggle ought not to deter us
from the support of a cause we believe to be just.”
Land of the boards and home of the cowards....
ReplyDeleteIf that many people believe that the proposed amendment failed because of the personality of the proponent, then seriously find a new standard bearer. We all know how the Declaration of Independence succeed in the Continental Congress because it wasn't just a debate on John Adams and his personality. If the debate he devolved to "I don't like the RG"... there are other Benjamin Franklins and Richard Henry Lees within the YRs who can advocate publically for change as well correct? Or is it just the RG and his four anonymous posting aliases who care?
ReplyDelete- Jack Strickland
Jack, are you one of RG's aliases too? So far 10 Watchers from 10 different IP addresses voted in the poll.
DeleteWe suspect you weren't at the meeting and didn't witness how it all went down. However, we are pretty sure you would have been sitting at the same table as JW and GS.